[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srmv2
I think the standalone srmv2 is the most recent, up-to-date version.
Maybe the inside mash version is just for backward compatability with
some older tools? Is that right, Suchi?
Angie
> Hi -
>
> --- Lloyd wrote:
> What's the difference between the standalone srmv2 and the srmv2 that's
> included inside of mash?
>
> Erik just informed me that the dc smash has to use the standalone
> version.
> ---
>
> I think the stand alone package is a C/C++ only library and the Mash
> version is partially written in Tcl. Angie says the C/C++ version is
> more efficient. We probably need to keep the stand alone version in the
> tree with other miscellaneous packages like librtp, tcldp, etc.
> Larry
> --
> Professor Lawrence A. Rowe Internet: Rowe@BMRC.Berkeley.EDU
> Computer Science Division - EECS Phone: 510-642-5117
> University of California, Berkeley Fax: 510-642-5615
> Berkeley, CA 94720-1776 URL: http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/~larry
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: srmv2
- From: Suchi Raman <suchi@wind.lcs.mit.edu>
- References:
- Re: srmv2
- From: "Lawrence A. Rowe" <Rowe@bmrc.berkeley.edu>